Fears for a free press as Chelsea boss 'takes over paper'

 

 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2216018,00.html

 

 

ROMAN ABRAMOVICH, Russiafs richest man, was reported yesterday to have bought Kommersant, the business daily, raising fears that one of the last bastions of press freedom in the country could be muted.

Mr Abramovich, the owner of Chelsea Football Club, is widely believed to have close ties to the Kremlin. At its request, he agreed last year to serve a second term as governor of the remote Arctic region of Chukotka.

Separately, Mikhail Gorbachev, the former leader of the Soviet Union, announced that he and a business partner had bought a significant share in another newspaper, Novaya Gazeta, to try to preserve its independence.

 

The two reported deals threw an uncomfortable spotlight on media freedom in Russia on the final day of a conference of world newspaper editors in Moscow. On Monday President Putin told the opening session of the World Newspaper Congress that Russia enjoyed freedom of the press and that the state was reducing its involvement in the sector.

But critics say that the state has indirect control over most of the important news publications and direct ownership of all the national television networks and radio stations.

Gazprom, the state-run gas monopoly, bought Izvestia, a leading daily newspaper, last year, and most of the others are owned by businessmen loyal to the Kremlin.

One notable exception is Kommersant, which has regularly published scandals and scoops that have reflected badly on the authorities, and it has faced a series of lawsuits as a result.

Media experts say that the Kommersant deal would signal the end of its days as the most aggressively independent news outlet in the country.

Abramovich is one of the oligarchs, known in Russia as gwalletsh. gIf a ewalletf buys something, that means the authorities need it,h Aleksei Simonov, the head of the Glasnost Defence Foundation, a press freedom watchdog, said. gFrom my point of view, this will do nothing good for media freedom in Russia.h

The business daily, which has a readership of about 100,000, was owned until recently by Boris Berezovsky, the exiled tycoon, who was granted political asylum in Britain in 2003.

But he sold his share to Badri Patarkatsishvili, his Georgian business partner, in February to try to save the paper from Kremlin pressure.

Mr Patarkatsishvili is said to have sold it on to Mr Abramovichfs investment company, Millhouse, for $120 million (£65 million), according to Ekho Moskvy, an independent radio station.

Pavel Filenkov, the commercial director of Kommersant, denied that the paper had been sold, but he told The Times that there had been discussions about such a deal.

John Mann, a spokesman for Millhouse, said that he could neither confirm nor deny the reports. No one at Mr Patarkatsishvilifs offices was willing to comment.

If confirmed, the transaction would mark a dramatic turn in Mr Abramovichfs career, less than a year after he sold his oil company, Sibneft, to Gazprom

Last week, it was confirmed that Mr Abramovich was in talks to buy a big stake in the Russian steel firm Evraz, signalling that the Kremlin had approved his return to the world of big business in Russia.

Novaya Gazeta, which is published twice weekly and has a readership of about 100,000, has a better chance of preserving its independence under its new owners, Mr Simonov said.

Mr Gorbachev said that he and Aleksandr Lebedev had bought a 49 per cent share in the newspaper, which has a reputation for good investigative journalism but suffers chronic financial problems. The remaining 51 per cent is owned by the staff of the paper.

 

Mr Lebedev is a wealthy businessman, a member of parliament and a prominent anti-corruption crusader. Mr Gorbachev initiated the Glasnost reforms that allowed independent media to flourish in the first place in the 1980s. He says that he supports President Putin, but he has often criticised Kremlin moves that have restricted media freedom.

gWe need to provide a pluralism of opinions and the reliability of its publications, and it must be reflective of public opinion in Russia,h Mr Gor-bachev said yesterday.

gWe, as shareholders, will co-operate with the editorial collective and will not adapt it to our corporate needs,h he said. gWe should — this is one of our goals — promote the newspaperfs qualitative development in the interests of democratic values.h

Dmitri Muratov, the Editor-in-Chief of Novaya Gazeta, said that the deal would allow him to compensate his journalists better and enable the paper to launch a new format and expand with more issues each week.

gI am sure that Mr Gorbachev didnft invest in us for commercial reasons,h Mr Muratov said. gHe wanted to protect our independence.

gWe wonft be used as a political or commercial tool. We will speak for society, not the Government.h

MOSCOW MOUTHPIECES

·  Rossiskaya Gazeta, pro-Kremlin, owned by the Russian Government, circulation 374,000

·  Izvestia, pro-Kremlin, owned by Gazprom Media, circulation 209,000

·  Komsomolskaya Pravda, pro-Kremlin, owned by the metals tycoon Vladimir Potanin, circulation 686,000

·  Argumenty i Fakty, pro-Kremlin, owned by Promsvyazbank, circulation 2.9 million

·  Moskovsky Komsomolets, pro-Kremlin, owned by Pavel Gusev, circulation 800,000